APR 29. 2008
Avoiding the Pitfalls of Doorways, Gateways and Bridge Pages
Feature article by Edward Lewis
of SEO Consultants Directory
Years ago a search engine optimization technique was developed to influence or manipulate the positioning of websites in the search engines. This technique is referred to as the creation of doorway, gateway or bridge pages. The concept is to build pages that rank highly for specific keyword sets. This is done by calculating the search engines algorithm and then building a page that ranks highly in that particular search engine based on the calculations.
There are a variety of programs that are marketed that will automatically create these doorway, gateway or bridge pages for you. You enter specific information into predefined form fields relative to the page that you want to optimize, and the program generates a page that is optimized for the selected search engine and keyword sets. These pages are referred to as machine generated pages.
Unfortunately, this technique has been abused over the years by many consumers and SEO/SEM consultants alike. We've seen websites that had 5 or 6 pages of core content and then hundreds of gateway pages that were developed to target just about every keyword set the site was optimized for. Typically, only a few of those pages may have ranked well, the rest were ineffective. Hence, the billions of web pages indexed as indicated in the next paragraph.
Today, this technique is frowned upon by the major search engines and directories. When you see numbers pertaining to billions of web pages being indexed, you can be assured that a large percentage of those are gateway, doorway or bridge pages. The search engine spiders or robots are more intelligent then they were a few years ago. These machine generated pages are being dropped from the search engine indexes on a regular basis, or they are buried so far down in the SERP's (Search Engine Results Pages), that they would never be found. At times, the entire domain that the pages reside on may receive a ranking penalty and/or be banned from the search engines index. Do you want to take that chance?
How do search engines know about these pages? If the pages are machine generated and untouched after generation, there is a specific footprint that the page has (the structure of that web page). When you look at the footprint of thousands of these pages, they are easy for search engine spiders to detect. Most doorway, gateway or bridge pages are orphaned. This means that they have no links pointing to them, but they have links pointing from them. The links pointing from them are usually aimed at your home page or a specific page on your website that the keyword set is targeting.
Believe it or not, this technique still works today with some search engines. Most, if not all of the major search engines and directories have published guidelines that state they do not want doorways, gateways or bridge pages in their indexes. These types of pages dilute the quality of the results and take up valuable resources.
If your website was designed without the consultancy of a search engine marketing professional, then you will probably need to make changes. If your website was built using Flash technology (.swf - movie file), or uses heavy graphics instead of an equal to, or greater than, balance of text to graphics, then you will need to make changes. If you cannot make the changes suggested by the SEO/SEM consultant, then you may need to consider using techniques that may or may not be considered Best Practices in SEO/SEM. It is your choice. Just be prepared for the long term implications of using such strategies as they may, or may not be detrimental to the success of your website.
Jan 19. 2008
There is currently a debate going on right now about Google removing the PageRank score from the Google Toolbar.
Why?
Toolbar PageRank numbers can be 3 months out of date or more.
Some “PR Updates” have been buggy enough to seriously misrepresent a page’s real PR.
Matt Cutts has blogged that PR Updates are considered pretty much a non-event around Google.
PageRank has started a flawed econonmy of link building and trading in an effort to raise or distribute these scores.
Unlike a lot of the rants which go on in forum threads, it seems that Google is keeping an eye on this one and taking it seriously.
Loren Baker,www.searchenginejournal.com
Jan 18. 2008
HTML 5.0 First Public Work Draft
After a mere 10 years the W3C Group has finally published its first public working draft of HTML 5. This latest HTML draft reflects the growing needs of the web, and has extended in several new directions. Some of the new inclusions are APIs for 2D Drawing, better control over embedded multimedia, and a huge list of changes.
"Ajax and related innovations have propelled demands for a new standard that allows people to create web applications that interoperate across desktop and mobile," the group said.
Additionally according to the W3C Group, HTML 5 will: "Improve interoperability and reduce software costs by giving precise rules not only about how to handle all correct HTML documents but also how to recover errors."
With all this is mind, you will only need to wait around 3 years for the spec to be finished.... browsers to support it.... and the public to embrace it.... for proof of this look no farther then CSS 1.0 which wasn't really heavily used (as intended with Pure CSS Design something Beanstalk specializes in) until around 2003, which came out in 1999.
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies
